1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna

More you might like

tuesday-underthesea
I guess it hasn’t occurred to fuckingsassysprinkles that it’s ridiculous – and potentially harmful – to anthropomorphize animals to the point of applying human concepts of gender to them. Hell, ideas about gender aren’t even universal among humans. Also, “male” and “female” describe an animal’s physical sex, not its gender.

Cat; March 18, 2014 by bullshitincorporated
(via deathspoon)

What this person obviously doesn’t realize is that the oppression of pets inasfar as keeping wild animals hostage inside your home is one thing, also abusing them by not allowing them gender identites is absurd and cruel. 

(via fuckingsassysprinkles)

Omg I just pray this person is a troll. Like you’re fucking kidding right?! My animals have no use for gender identities and why would I ever use one on a dog? I just call it by its name.

(via tuesday-underthesea)

As long as it’s a gender neutral name, it’s fine. I don’t see the problem here. 

tuesday-underthesea Source: deathspoon
stretchermonkeyphotography

Anonymous asked:

I am a white cishet male and I follow you lol

fuckingsassysprinkles answered:

Well you can go ahead and stop now, thanks :)

stretchermonkeyphotography:

fuckingsassysprinkles:

stretchermonkeyphotography:

But it’s fun watching the train wreck you call a blog.

What was the point of sending me a comment anonymously and then identifying yourself on your own blog? If you’re going to fuck up that badly, then you deserve to be as stupid as you are. 

Not my actual question. I wouldn’t waste time sending a retarded piece of shit like you a comment.

You just sent me a comment regardless of your feelings towards me, thereby contradicting your own statement. How good does it feel to watch your few remaining brain cells melt away? 

stretchermonkeyphotography Source: fuckingsassysprinkles
toronto-bitch

Anonymous asked:

so if being attracted to genitalia and not gender, or gender but not genitalia are both transphobic, do you think asexual people are just all kinds of -phobic? You cant call someone oppressive just because they aren't attracted to people or body parts or pronouns.

fuckingsassysprinkles answered:

Asexuality isn’t oppressive or phobic because unlike people who have specific sexual preferences, asexuals don’t oppress others. 

toronto-bitch:

What about white, male, rich asexuals who are romantically attracted to women?

They aren’t oppressive because they’re asexual, they’re oppressive because they’re rich white men. 

toronto-bitch Source: fuckingsassysprinkles
juneaupaws

Anonymous asked:

I'm 16 year old, white, European and highly privileged cisgirl. Never misgendered someone on purpose & a LGBT++ ally. Can you really call me a bad person because of things like my sexual preferences? I don't get it.

fuckingsassysprinkles answered:

I wouldn’t call you a bad person, no. I’d say that you’re doing good things and I would commend you for that. You’re in a position of privilege, and you’re one of the only people doing anything with that power. I would say, however, that your sexual preferences are still oppressive and misguided, but you’re on the right track :3

juneaupaws:

If her sexual preference is misguided then so is yours yea you can’t have one I she can have one fuck you

“yea you can’t have one I she can have one” 

Do you even know how to read? Why are you on the internet?

juneaupaws Source: fuckingsassysprinkles
juneaupaws

juneaupaws:

fuckingsassysprinkles:

Can we talk about the disgusting treatment of people of color by white men parading themselves as police? I didn’t realize that “police” meant “kill colored people and make money from it.” 

White people are disgusting. 

Yeah because saying white people as a whole are disgusting isn’t racist

You can’t be racist against the people who hold all of the power over you. It’s like telling your boss that they’re fired, and they tell you you’re fired. In both cases, it’s the same message, but different outcomes based on the position of power. 

juneaupaws Source: fuckingsassysprinkles racism America oppression
socialjusticeswitzerland

Anonymous asked:

I was looking through a couple of your posts and, I'm not hating on you or anything, but I'd just like you to clarify something: You said in one of your earlier responses that it would be ok to be anti white because white people are a valid group of people to hate. Isn't a message like that counter productive? Who has the right to decide who is "valid" and who isn't? And aren't you perpetuating racial prejudice it by trying to fight prejudice with more prejudice?Just politely asking :)

fuckingsassysprinkles answered:

I appreciate your respectful question!

And the reason it’s not prejudiced to hate white people is because they hold the most power in the Western World, and thus it’s impossible for them to be discriminated against, since the economic, social, and legal systems all work in their favor. 

I hope this clarifies things for you!

socialjusticeswitzerland:

But what about the rest of the world? They don’t hold the most power in the rest of the world. So wouldn’t that mean you’re americentric? As in thinking the world revolves around America? Yes. It does. That’s kind of insensitive

Actually they do hold the most power in the rest of the world. Because of the globalization of economy and the intrusion into “developing nations” and “Third world countries” by American, Russian, and European economies, white people hold all of the economic power in the entire world. 

Do you even know what the world is right now? 

socialjusticeswitzerland Source: fuckingsassysprinkles
glalpanda94

Anonymous asked:

I love your account! Whenever I feel down about myself I look through your posts and think to myself "wow I could have it so much worse! I could be an absolute fucking moron like you!" So thank you

fuckingsassysprinkles answered:

It’s cishets like you that make my job necessary, so thank you for demonstrating your inability to grasp basic concepts like human decency and equality. 

glalpanda94:

Aaaaaand here we see bigotry at it’s finest. You just assume that because this person does not like your blog that they are cis? That sounds pretty oppressive to me.

Not only is it impossible to oppress those who are in power, but it’s also FAR more likely that this person is a cishet moron, because they are so great at their inability to be decent human beings and really good at being immature fuckboys. 

glalpanda94 Source: fuckingsassysprinkles
blog-nineandthreequarters
I guess it hasn’t occurred to fuckingsassysprinkles that it’s ridiculous – and potentially harmful – to anthropomorphize animals to the point of applying human concepts of gender to them. Hell, ideas about gender aren’t even universal among humans. Also, “male” and “female” describe an animal’s physical sex, not its gender.

Cat; March 18, 2014 by bullshitincorporated
(via deathspoon)

What this person obviously doesn’t realize is that the oppression of pets inasfar as keeping wild animals hostage inside your home is one thing, also abusing them by not allowing them gender identites is absurd and cruel. 

(via fuckingsassysprinkles)

have we got to the stage of mental retardation where we are saying dogs, cats, and fucking goldfish are allowed to choose which gender norm they fit under? ANIMALS DON’T HAVE GENDER NORMS THEY HAVE BIOLOGY.

(via blog-nineandthreequarters)

So do humans. 

Check.

blog-nineandthreequarters Source: deathspoon
See this in the app Show more